Allocation of Parental Responsibility to One Parent

Many parents in the beginning stages of the divorce process have heard the phrases “joint custody” or “sole custody” but often do not understand the actual legal meaning of the terms. Commonly, people mistakenly believe the parent with the majority of parenting time has “sole custody.” The decision of whether sole or joint “custody” is appropriate is also generally unrelated to parties’ parenting schedules. In Illinois, the term “legal custody” (in contrast to “physical custody”) used to refer to a parent’s ability to make decisions for their minor children in the major areas of religious upbringing, healthcare, education, and extracurricular activities. Effective January 1, 2016, the Illinois legislature has abolished the term “sole custody.” Now, decision making authority is allocated to one or both parents on an issue-by-issue basis.

If decision making authority on any given issue is allocated to one parent, the parent to whom it is awarded is granted the right to make decisions regarding their child without obtaining the agreement of or even consulting with the other parent. Generally speaking, most parents who have maintained some degree of involvement in their children’s lives seek joint “custody,” or joint allocation of parental responsibilities. However, in some cases, sole decision making authority is the only plausible choice. For example, in cases in which one parent is absent, there has been substantial domestic violence, or the level of conflict between the parents is so high that the children would be negatively impacted by a joint allocation arrangement, the courts are likely to award one parent sole responsibility for making major decisions.

As with “residential custody” or parenting time, the decision whether to award joint or sole decision making authority is determined in accordance with the best interest factors of Section 602 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, which can be found here.

The court will also consider the parents’ past involvement in the children’s lives. In cases where a parent had previously shown no interest in the children’s education, religious upbringing, activities, and healthcare, the court might be more likely to award sole responsibility to the parent who had been making those decisions previously. Also, the courts will examine how well the parents communicate and cooperate with one another.

It is a common misconception that if a party has sole allocation of parental responsibilities for a child that they may relocate the child outside the State of Illinois without permission of the court. Relocation (formerly “removal”) of a child is governed by Section 609.2 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act and is unrelated to the issue of decision making responsibility.

Even in cases in which one parent has sole decision making authority, the “non-custodial” parent is still entitled to access to information, including medical and dental records, childcare information and school reports. However, some orders, particularly those entered under the Illinois Domestic Violence Act, may prohibit access to this type of information if it appears that the parent without such authority will simply use that information to harass or abuse the decision-making parent or the children.

If you are unsure as to what parenting plan is the right decision for your family, or if you have questions about the legal standards or process, you should speak with an attorney at Kollias & Giese, P.C. Having litigated several contested trials, they can provide important information about the requirements of the law, about likely outcomes in court, as well as about parenting plans that have proven successful. Even more importantly, they can evaluate, and, if necessary, present to the court the unique factors present in each case.

Client Reviews
Dan's expert handling of my divorce case was beyond my expectations. He takes control, documents your facts and summarizes options for you throughout the process. You will always get a timely response by email or phone. He will not forget the facts in your case or be uprepared for milestones along the way. He will advise on important matters but act per your direction. Finally, he will maintain a positive and professional communication with all parties involved. Jacquelyn
Lisa has been my lawyer for the past 4 years for various court precedings and has been awesome. She always knew what was going on with my case and always took the time to ask what I wanted the end result to be. She’s tough and not scared to speak her mind in a courtroom in order to fight for her client. Lisa also always worked with me financially in order to work around what I could afford. I would 10/10 recommend her to anyone and would hire her again if needed. Cali
Ms. Defino did an absolutely amazing job working with me on my case. She was very, very prepared, was excellent in responding to calls, emails and messages, understood the law and worked with with partners of her firm if there were areas that we needed advice and other opinions on. Jessica was a very comfortable to work with, super personal and got all of my needs and wants out of my divorce case. I would highly recommend working with Ms. Defino. Matt
I was represented better than I could have ever imagined. My needs were put first and was treated as a friend rather than a number. My opinions were valued and my doubts were always reassured. My nerves were calmed and the process was always explained. Jane Nagle fought hard for me. she went above and beyond and did everything she could to ensure a great outcome. I couldn't have asked for a better attorney and her firm. Thank you from the bottom of my heart. Marcia